COP29, Baku, a sword in the water?

Third Chronicle and Conclusions on COP29 by Bertrand Piccard

Who pays for the climate crisis—and what for? At COP29 in Baku, billions were pledged, but the allocation of responsibilities remains murky. Without a clear distinction between compensation and investment, further conflicts and stagnation loom.
 
Bertrand Piccard © Solar Impulse Foundation
The negotiators had only one thing on their minds: to find a number of billions that would prevent COP29 from ending in failure. The conference president had warned that the agreement would be fair if each delegation left Baku with the same dissatisfaction at paying too much or receiving too little. This appears to be the case, with 1,300 billion dollars mobilised by the richest countries between now and 2035, including 300 billion a year specifically allocated to developing countries. Too much for the payers, who report their budget and debt problems, and ridiculously little for those who are suffering the effects of climate change without having contributed to it. 

Yet I think the problem lies at another level. I'm surprised that so few people are talking about it. Who exactly is going to pay, to whom, and why?

The developed countries, which have been polluting the longest, are not necessarily the richest today. With its deficit budgets and abysmal debts, Europe is not in a position to show much generosity. The USA, despite its chronic deficit, remains the world's leading power, but the arrival of Trump will certainly not loosen the purse strings of the climate. That leaves Canada, Australia, Japan and New Zealand: nothing to boast about. Many other countries should be involved in this drive to help the poorest. 
 
Who Pays and Who Benefits? The Missing Clarity
The question of ‘who pays’ and ‘who gets’ was overshadowed by the size of the bill, which drew everyone's attention. They may not have been emitting greenhouse gases for as long, but they are now among the world's biggest polluters: China, India, Brazil and so on. And the countries that produce fossil fuels? Even if the rest of the world uses their products, they are still the ones supplying them, and building megacities with the proceeds. So why shouldn't all these countries also pay? They have become the richest, even if they hide behind an average salary that allows them to be classified as a developing country. So some of them, not content with simply avoiding paying, are trying to put themselves on the list of those who should be compensated!  

Secondly, what are we paying for? Of course the biggest emitters of greenhouse gases have a responsibility to the rest of the world, and it is clear that the countries that are currently suffering the most must be helped. Dykes need to be built, islands raised, infrastructure destroyed by hurricanes repaired, crops destroyed by drought or flooding compensated for. It is not up to the victims to pay, and the results of COP29 are there to remind us of this. Happily so. Without the much-criticised UN conference process, we wouldn't even be where we are today.
 
Investment vs. Compensation: Two Sides of the Climate Coin
But when it comes to building renewable energy infrastructures, which are much more profitable than those that run on fossil fuels, installing more efficient processes using cleantech, insulating buildings... in short, moving from a world that wastes fossil fuels to one that saves on renewable energy, we are dealing with a different logic: that of investment rather than compensation. Here, the billions cannot come from the same pocket, since an investment is by definition lucrative, whereas a donation, repair or compensation is not directly so.

The same applies to Switzerland, where the recent adoption of the Climate Act and the revision of the CO2  law are steps in the right direction, albeit insufficient ones. Without a clear commitment to direct funding towards the energy transition, there is a risk that these laws will remain an empty letter. Switzerland's drop in the international ranking of climate efforts, revealed during COP29, is striking proof of this: legislating is not enough; we also need to release the resources to take action.

If all this is not better defined, we will continue to debate in sterile confusion. And if we have Azeri in Baku, we'll be crying next year at COP30 in Belém, Brazil.
 
See also: forum special entry on COP29 - A collection of reports and comments by forum correspondents

About the Solar Impulse Foundation and Bertrand Piccard
To address sustainability challenges while enabling economic growth, Bertrand Piccard and the Solar Impulse Foundation have identified 1000+ clean and profitable solutions. The Solar Impulse Foundation has organized these solutions into a search-engine for climate action - the Solutions Explorer - in order to support their implementation at scale. By giving political and economic decision-makers the tools to adopt much more ambitious energy and environmental policies, the Foundation will help them to set a roadmap to reach their environmental objectives.
 
Bertrand dedicates his life to demonstrate the opportunities lying in sustainable development and to raise interest in profitable solutions to protect the environment. He is a pioneer of new ways of thinking that reconcile ecology and economy, and uses his exploration feats to motivate governments and industries to take action. Bertrand has always advocated that solving climate change - rather than an expensive problem - is a fantastic market opportunity. He actively speaks out against the absurdity of the outdated and polluting devices and systems we are still using and promotes the benefits of existing efficient technologies to motivate governments and industries to take action.

Kontakt: Solar Impulse Foundation, Daniela Diego | daniela.diego@solarimpulse.com | solarimpulse.com


Umwelt | Klima, 25.11.2024

     
        
Cover des aktuellen Hefts

Pioniere der Hoffnung

forum 01/2025 ist erschienen

  • Bodendegradation
  • ESG-Ratings
  • Nachhaltige Awards
  • Next-Gen Materialien
Weiterlesen...
Kaufen...
Abonnieren...
09
DEZ
2024
Ein leuchtendes Zeichen für Demokratie und Gemeinschaft
Tollwood Winterfestival unter dem Motto "Wir braucht Dich!", 26.11.-23.12.2024
80336 München
10
DEZ
2024
KI-PowerWorkshop
Die besten KI-Tools für Selbständige & KMU's
online
17
JAN
2025
Systemische Aufstellungen von Familienunternehmen und Unternehmerfamilien
Constellations machen Dynamiken sichtbar - Ticketrabatt für forum-Leser*innen!
online
Alle Veranstaltungen...
Lassen Sie sich begeistern von einem Buch, das Hoffnung macht

Professionelle Klimabilanz, einfach selbst gemacht

Einfache Klimabilanzierung und glaubhafte Nachhaltigkeitskommunikation gemäß GHG-Protocol

Megatrends

Deutsche (Männer) lesen immer weniger
Christoph Quarch wünscht sich eine Kampagne von Buchhandel und Politik, um Leser zurückzugewinnen
B.A.U.M. Insights

Jetzt auf forum:

Mehr als eine schnelle Antwort auf aktuelle Trends

Die Geheimnisse der Papierindustrie

Wir brauchen einen DNP „reloaded“!

Eine Vision soll Wirklichkeit werden

Wenn Würdigungen entwürdigt werden

FNG-Siegel: 18 Fonds der Erste Asset Management mit Bestnote ausgezeichnet

"Leave no one behind" –

Jugendliche entwickeln Ideen für eine gerechtere Welt

  • Energieagentur Rheinland-Pfalz GmbH
  • Global Nature Fund (GNF)
  • World Future Council. Stimme zukünftiger Generationen
  • BAUM e.V. - Netzwerk für nachhaltiges Wirtschaften
  • DGNB - Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen
  • Protect the Planet. Gesellschaft für ökologischen Aufbruch gGmbH
  • ECOFLOW EUROPE S.R.O.
  • Futouris - Tourismus. Gemeinsam. Zukunftsfähig
  • Engagement Global gGmbH
  • circulee GmbH
  • Kärnten Standortmarketing
  • Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG